In a recent statement, Prophet Jeremiah Fufeyin, the founder of Christ Mercyland Deliverance Ministry, expressed his disapproval of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) regulating spiritual products. According to Fufeyin, NAFDAC does not have the authority to control items tied to religious faith and spiritual practices, emphasizing that there are limitations to what regulatory bodies can do when it comes to matters of faith.
“NAFDAC does not have the right to regulate spiritual products,” Fufeyin said. “There is a limit to what people can do, especially when it comes to matters of faith.”
The cleric’s remarks come amid ongoing discussions about the regulation of alternative medicine, spiritual items, and other non-conventional products that are increasingly marketed for their purported spiritual and health benefits. Spiritual products, which often include anointing oils, holy water, Miracle job water and other religious items, have seen a rise in popularity among believers seeking divine intervention for various life challenges.
Fufeyin’s comments suggest a pushback against any attempt by NAFDAC to classify these products under the same regulatory framework used for conventional medicines, supplements, and consumables. He argued that faith-based items are fundamentally different from conventional products and should not be subjected to the same oversight and scrutiny.
NAFDAC, responsible for regulating and controlling the manufacture, importation, exportation, advertisement, distribution, sale, and use of food, drugs, cosmetics, medical devices, chemicals, and packaged water, has not yet issued a statement in response to Fufeyin’s comments. The agency has, in recent times, ramped up efforts to ensure that all consumable and medicinal products in the market meet safety standards to protect consumers from potential harm.
READ ALSO: Pastor Jeremiah’s Miracle Water, Soap Under Investigation — NAFDAC
The debate over the regulation of spiritual products touches on broader issues of religious freedom, consumer protection, and public health safety. While Fufeyin insists that matters of faith should remain free from regulatory control, some experts argue that certain levels of oversight are necessary to protect consumers from potentially harmful products that might be sold under the guise of spirituality.
Fufeyin’s statement is likely to spark further debate about the balance between religious freedom and regulatory oversight, particularly as more spiritual leaders introduce products to their congregations and followers. As it stands, the conversation continues about where the line should be drawn in regulating products that blend faith with commerce.
