By Shina Olabisi
In response to an article portraying popular social media personality VeryDarkMan (VDM) as a puppet of the establishment, a counter-narrative has emerged, refuting these claims as inaccurate and unfounded. Critics of the original piece argue that portraying VDM as a tool of the government, allegedly orchestrated by the Minister of Interior, Olubumi Tunji-Ojo, is both misleading and an attempt to distort his real influence.
The rebuttal stresses that VeryDarkMan’s rise to prominence stems from his genuine engagement with social issues, not any political agenda. Known for speaking out on topics such as injustice, inequality, and the daily struggles faced by Nigerians, VDM has become a voice for many, particularly through his accessible and relatable content. His critics argue that labeling him as a distraction from governmental failings is a disservice to his work, which has sparked meaningful conversations on social and political matters often avoided in public discourse.
“VeryDarkMan is neither a distraction nor a puppet of any establishment,” the response firmly states, highlighting that his role is to bring attention to important societal issues rather than deflect from them. The narrative that he is somehow being manipulated by government forces is seen as an effort to undermine his legitimacy and impact, while those in power should instead be held accountable for their actions and policies.
The article calls for the public to focus on the real issues plaguing the country, including corruption, the rising cost of living, and poor governance. It urges a shift away from conspiracy theories that wrongfully accuse individuals standing with the people, like VeryDarkMan, and instead directs attention to those truly responsible for Nigeria’s systemic problems.
This pushback represents the ongoing tension between influencers like VDM and those who seek to question their motivations, raising broader questions about the role of social media personalities in shaping public opinion.
